Optimal control of the angle between two rigid inclusions in an inhomogeneous 2D body
https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.21.94.005
Abstract
A nonlinear mathematical model describing equilibrium of a two-dimensional elastic body with two thin rigid inclusions is investigated. It is assumed that two rigid inclusions have one common connection point. Moreover, a connection between two inclusions at a given point is characterized by a positive damage parameter. Rectilinear inclusions are located at a given angle to each other in an initial state. Nonlinear Signorini conditions are imposed, which describe the contact with the obstacle, as well as a homogeneous Dirichlet condition is set on corresponding parts of the outer boundary of the body. An optimal control problem for the parameter that specifies the angle between inclusions is formulated. The quality functional is given by an arbitrary continuous functional defined on the Sobolev space. The solvability of the optimal control problem is proved. A continuous dependence of solutions on varying angle parameter between the inclusions is established.
About the Authors
N. P. Lazarev
Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Scientific Research Institute of Mathematics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nyurgun P. Lazarev
58 Belinsky Street, Yakutsk 677891
N. A. Romanova
Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Scientific Research Institute of Mathematics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya A. Romanova
58 Belinsky Street, Yakutsk 677891
References
1. Itou H., Kovtunenko V. A., and Rajagopal K. R. , “Nonlinear elasticity with limiting small strain for cracks subject to non-penetration,” Math. Mech. Solids, 22, No. 6, 1334–1346 (2017).
2. Kazarinov N. A., Rudoy E. M., Slesarenko V. Y., and Shcherbakov V. V., “Mathematical and numerical simulation of equilibrium of an elastic body reinforced by a thin elastic inclusion,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 58, No. 5, 761–774 (2018).
3. Itou H., Kovtunenko V. A., and Rajagopal K. R., “Nonlinear elasticity with limiting small strain for cracks subject to nonpenetration,” Math. Mech. Solids, 22, No. 6, 1334–1346 (2017).
4. Furtsev A., Itou H., and Rudoy E., “Modeling of bonded elastic structures by a variational method: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 182–183, 100–111 (2020).
5. Khludnev A. M., Elasticity Problems in Nonsmooth Domains [in Russian], Fizmatlit, Moscow (2010).
6. Khludnev A. M. and Kovtunenko V. A., Analysis of Cracks in Solids, WIT-Press, Southampton (2000).
7. Khludnev A. M., “On modeling thin inclusions in elastic bodies with a damage parameter,” Math. Mech. Solids, 24, No. 9, 2742–2753 (2019).
8. Neustroeva N. V. and Lazarev N. P., “Optimal control of the crack angle in the equilibrium problem for a Timoshenko plate with elastic inclusion [in Russian],” Mat. Zametki SVFU, 28, No. 4, 58–70 (2021).
9. Khludnev A. M., “Optimal control of crack growth in elastic body with inclusions,” Eur. J. Mech., A, Solids, 29, No. 3, 392–399 (2010).
10. Khludnev A. and Leugering G., “On elastic bodies with thin rigid inclusions and cracks,” Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 33, 1955–1967 (2010).
11. Khludnev A., “Non-coercive problems for Kirchhoff–Love plates with thin rigid inclusion,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73, No. 2, paper No. 54 (2022).
12. Fankina I. V., Furtsev A. I., Rudoy E. M., and Sazhenkov S. A., “Asymptotic modeling of curvilinear narrow inclusions with rough boundaries in elastic bodies: case of a soft inclusion,” Sib. Electron. Math. Rep., 19, No. 2, 935–948 (2022).
13. Furtsev A. I., “On contact between a thin obstacle and a plate containing a thin inclusion,” J. Math. Sci., 237, No. 4, 530–545 (2019).
14. Lazarev N. and Rudoy E., “Optimal location of a finite set of rigid inclusions in contact problems for inhomogeneous two-dimensional bodies,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., 403, paper No. 113710 (2022).
15. Kovtunenko V. A. and Kunisch K., “Shape derivative for penalty-constrained nonsmoothnonconvex optimization: cohesive crack problem,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 194, 597–635 (2022).
16. Lazarev N. P., Semenova G. M., and Romanova N. A., “On a limiting passage as the thickness of a rigid inclusions in an equilibrium problem for a Kirchhoff–Love plate with a crack,” J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Math., Phys., 14, No. 1, 28–41 (2021).
17. Rudoy E. M. and Shcherbakov V. V., “First-order shape derivative of the energy for elastic plates with rigid inclusions and interfacial cracks,” Appl. Math. Optim., 84, 2775–2802 (2021).
18. Lazarev N. P. and Rudoy E. M., “Optimal size of a rigid thin stiffener reinforcing an elastic plate on the outer edge,” Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 97, No. 9, 1120–1127 (2017).
19. Shcherbakov V. V., “Shape optimization of rigid inclusions for elastic plates with cracks,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 67, No. 3, paper No. 71 (2016).
20. Khludnev A. M., “Junction problem for thin elastic and volume rigid inclusions in elastic body,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 380, No. 2236, paper No. 20210360 (2022).
21. Khludnev A., Esposito A. C. and Faella L., “Optimal control of parameters for elastic body with thin inclusions,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 184, No. 1, 293–314 (2020).
22. Khludnev A. M. and Popova T. S., “On junction problem with damage parameter for Timoshenko and rigid inclusions inside elastic body,” Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 100, No. 8, paper No. e202000063 (2020).
23. Lazarev N. and Neustroeva N., “Optimal control of rigidity parameter of elastic inclusions in composite plate with a crack,” in: Mathematics and Computing ICMC (D. Ghosh, D. Giri, R. Mohapatra, K. Sakurai, E. Savas, T. Som, eds.), pp. 67–77, Springer, Singapore (2018). (Springer Proc. Math. Stat.; vol. 253).
24. Popova T. S., “Numerical solution of the equilibrium problem for a two-dimensional elastic body with a thin semirigid inclusion,” Mat. Zametki SVFU, 28, No. 1, 51–66 (2021).
25. Rudoy E. M. and Shcherbakov V. V., “Domain decomposition method for a membrane with a delaminated thin rigid inclusion,” Sib. Electron. Math. Rep., 13, No. 1, 395–410 (2016).
26. Hinterm¨uller M., Kovtunenko V. A., and Kunisch K., “A Papkovich–Neuber-based numerical approach to cracks with contact in 3D,” IMA J. Appl. Math., 74, No. 3, 325–343 (2009).
27. Itou H., Khludnev A. M., Rudoy E. M., and Tani A., “Asymptotic behaviour at a tip of a rigid line inclusion in linearized elasticity,” Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 92, No. 9, 716–730 (2012).
28. Jobin T. M., Ramji M., and Khaderi S. N., “Numerical evaluation of the interaction of rigid line inclusions using strain intensity factors,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 153–154, 10–20 (2019).
29. Hu K. X. and Chandra A., “Interactions among general systems of cracks and anticracks: an integral equation approach,” J. Appl. Mech., 60, No. 4, 920–928 (1993).
30. Shcherbakov V. V., “Existence of an optimal shape of the thin rigid inclusions in the Kirchhoff– Love plate,” J. Appl. Ind. Math., 8, No. 1, 97–105 (2014).
31. Karnaev V. M., “Optimal control of thin elastic inclusion in an elastic body,” Sib. Electron. Math. Rep., 19, No. 1, 187–210 (2022).
32. Lazarev N. P., Sharin E. F., and Semenova G. M., “Optimal control of the location of the hinge point of rigid inclusions in an equilibrium problem of a Timoshenko plate,” Chelyab. Fiz.-Mat. Zh., 6, No. 3, 278–288 (2021).
33. Lazarev N., “Inverse problem for cracked inhomogeneous Kirchhoff-Love plate with two hinged rigid inclusions,” Bound. Value Probl., 2021, No. 1, paper No. 88 (2021).
34. Baiocchi C. and Capello A., Variational and Quasivariational Inequalities: Application to Free Boundary Problems, Wiley, New York (1984).
35. Mikhailov V. P. Partial Differential Equations [in Russian], Mir, Moscow (1978).
Review
For citations:
Lazarev N.P., Romanova N.A. Optimal control of the angle between two rigid inclusions in an inhomogeneous 2D body. Mathematical notes of NEFU. 2023;30(3):38-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.21.94.005
Views:
7
JATS XML
Email this article 