Preview

Mathematical notes of NEFU

Advanced search

A mathematical model of carbon dynamics in wetland ecosystems with consideration of climatic factors

https://doi.org/10.25587/2411-9326-2025-1-80-89

Abstract

This study presents a mathematical model describing the carbon cycle in wetland ecosystems of northern regions. The model characterizes carbon concentration in two key reservoirs: Live (living plants and biomass) and Mort (dead organic matter). The primary processes incorporated in the model include photosynthesis, autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, biomass decay, and carbon transport via groundwater. These processes are formalized with respect to temperature and groundwater level. The inclusion of groundwater level allows us to consider of differences between aerobic and anaerobic organic matter decomposition processes. Numerical simulations were performed using model data. Under conditions of low temperatures and high groundwater levels, heterotrophic respiration is slowed, leading to the formation of anaerobic conditions that favor the accumulation of carbon in the soil. In contrast, under reduced water levels, increased oxygen availability to organic material stimulates aerobic decomposition, resulting in higher CO2 emissions. Unlike models focused on global processes, this work emphasizes the specific climatic, hydrological, and biochemical conditions of northern wetlands, which is crucial for accurately modeling the carbon balance in cold regions.

About the Authors

S. P. Semenov
Yugra State University
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Semenov

16 Chekhov Street, Khanty-Mansiysk 628012



E. A. Dyukarev
Yugra State University; UNESCO Chair «Dynamics of the Environment and Global Climate Change»; Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems SB RAS, Laboratory of Physics of Climatic Systems
Russian Federation

Egor A. Dyukarev

16 Chekhov Street, Khanty-Mansiysk 628012;

10/3 Akademichesky Avenue, Tomsk 634021



A. O. Tashkin
Yugra State University
Russian Federation

Artem O. Tashkin

16 Chekhov Street, Khanty-Mansiysk 628012



References

1. Huang B., Zipper S., Peng S., and Qiu J., “Groundwater effects on net primary productivity and soil organic carbon: a global analysis,” Environ. Res. Lett., 18, No. 8, 084024 (2023).

2. Hilbert D., Roulet N., and Moore T., “Modelling and analysis of peatlands as dynamical systems,” J. Ecol., 88, 230–242 (2001).

3. St-Hilaire F., Wu J., Roulet N., Frolking S., Lafleur P., Humphreys E., and Arora V., “McGill Wetland Model: Evaluation of a peatland carbon simulator developed for global assessments,” Biogeosci., 7, No. 11, 3517–3530 (2010).

4. Yan L., Li Y., Zhang X., Wu H., Kang E., Zhongqing Y., Zhang K., Li M., Yang A., Niu Y., Wang X., Yu X., and Kang X., “Carbon fluxes of alpine peatlands were jointly affected by water table level changes and the duration,” J. Soils Sediments, 23, 1–11 (2023).

5. Zavalishin N., “Coupled modeling of peatlands carbon cycle and carbon dioxide emission from their peat deposits,” IOP Conf. Ser., Earth Environ. Sci., 1093, 012009 (2022).

6. Qiu C., Zhu D., Ciais P., Guenet B., Krinner G., Peng S., Aurela M., Bernhofer C., Bruemmer C., Bret-Harte S., Chu H., Chen J., Desai A. R., Dusek J., Euskirchen E. S., Fortuniak K., Flanagan L. B., Friborg T., Grygoruk M., ... , and Ziemblinska K., “ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO2, water, and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales,” Geosci. Model Development, 11, 497–519 (2018).

7. Delire C., Sfrian R., Decharme B., Alkama R., Calvet J.-C., Carrer D., et al., “The global land carbon cycle simulated with ISBA-CTRIP: Improvements over the last decade,” J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, No. 9, e2019MS001886 (2020).

8. Jrveoja J., Peichl M., Maddison M., Soosaar K., Vellak K., Karofeld E., Teemusk A., and Mander U., ¨ “Impact of water table level on annual carbon and greenhouse gas balances of a restored peat extraction area,” Biogeosci. Discussions, 12, 17177–17218 (2015).

9. Heidari P. and Hassanzadeh H., “Modeling of carbon dioxide leakage from storage aquifers,” Fluids, 3, No. 4, 80 (2018).

10. Zhang Y., Xiao X., Guanter L., Zhou S., Ciais P., Joanna J., Sitch S., Wu X. et al., “Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production,” Sci. Rep., 6, 39748 (2016).

11. Semenov S. P., Dyukarev E. A., and Tashkin A. O. “Biogeochemical carbon cycles numerical modeling in wetland ecosystems,” Lobachevskii J. Math., 44, No. 3, 1223–1228 (2023).

12. Semenov S. P., Dyukarev E. A., and Tashkin A. O., “A mathematical model for calculating the dynamics of carbon in wetland ecosystems of the cold regions of Western Siberia,” Math. Zamet. SVFU, 31, No. 1, 102–112 (2024).

13. Worrall F., Moody C. S., Clay G. D., Burt T. P., and Rose R., “The flux of organic matter through a peatland ecosystem: The role of cellulose, lignin, and their control of the ecosystem oxidation state,” J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 122, 1655–1671 (2017).


Review

For citations:


Semenov S.P., Dyukarev E.A., Tashkin A.O. A mathematical model of carbon dynamics in wetland ecosystems with consideration of climatic factors. Mathematical notes of NEFU. 2025;32(1):80-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2411-9326-2025-1-80-89

Views: 0

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2411-9326 (Print)
ISSN 2587-876X (Online)